ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login
JSON | SOAP

Sediment_classification (MapServer)

View In:   ArcGIS JavaScript   NIWA ArcGIS Enterprise Map Viewer   ArcGIS Earth   ArcGIS Pro

Service Description:

This layer shows a compilation of separate sediment layers (Mud, Sand, and Gravel) to portray a combined picture of bottom composition. Rock along with nine sediment types were initially defined according to the Folk sediment classification system based on the percentage of mud, sand, and gravel within cells (Folk et al., 1970). These were then grouped into mud, mixed sediment (mud + gravel and mud + gravel + sand), sand, and course sediment (gravel and gravel + sand) based on the figure below and are shown with rocky reef areas overlayed. Most of New Zealand’s seafloor is covered by soft sediments, which tend to be characterized by less macrobiotic biodiversity than course sediment and rocky areas, although different key biogenic habitats can be found in each of these habitat types. Different configurations of grain sizes and materials are indicative of geologic history, hydrodynamic conditions, seafloor topography and biological activity and as a result host differing communities of organisms.

Source and reference:

“The Folk sediment triangle and the hierarchy of Folk classification (15, 6 and 4 classes, plus an additional class “rock and boulders,” indicated by the arrow) used in the EMODnet Geology project.” (Kaskela et al., 2019).

Folk RL, Andrews PB, Lewis DW. 1970. Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 13:937–968. DOI:10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211

Kaskela, A. M., Kotilainen, A. T., Alanen, U., Cooper, R., Green, S., Guinan, J., et al. (2019). Picking up the pieces–Harmonising and collating seabed substrate data for European maritime areas. Geosciences 9:84. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9020084 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331094612_Picking_Up_the_Pieces-Harmonising_and_Collating_Seabed_Substrate_Data_for_European_Maritime_Areas

References for sediment and rock layers included:

Bostock, H., C. Jenkins, K. Mackay, L. Carter, S. Nodder, A. Orpin, A. Pallentin, and R. Wysoczanski. 2019. Distribution of surficial sediments in the ocean around New Zealand/Aotearoa. Part A: continental slope and deep ocean. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 62:1-23.

Bostock, H., C. Jenkins, K. Mackay, L. Carter, S. Nodder, A. Orpin, A. Pallentin, and R. Wysoczanski. 2019. Distribution of surficial sediments in the ocean around New Zealand/Aotearoa. Part B: continental shelf. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 62:24-45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00288306.2018.1523199

Jenkins CJ. 1997. Building offshore soils databases. Sea Technology. 38(12):25–28.

Smith, A. N., Duffy, C., Anthony, J., and Leathwick, J. R. 2013. Predicting the distribution and relative abundance of fishes on shallow subtidal reefs around New Zealand, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand



Map Name: Map

Legend

All Layers and Tables

Dynamic Legend

Dynamic All Layers

Layers: Description:

This layer shows a compilation of separate sediment layers (Mud, Sand, and Gravel) to portray a combined picture of bottom composition. Rock along with nine sediment types were initially defined according to the Folk sediment classification system based on the percentage of mud, sand, and gravel within cells (Folk et al., 1970). These were then grouped into mud, mixed sediment (mud + gravel and mud + gravel + sand), sand, and course sediment (gravel and gravel + sand) based on the figure below and are shown with rocky reef areas overlayed. Most of New Zealand’s seafloor is covered by soft sediments, which tend to be characterized by less macrobiotic biodiversity than course sediment and rocky areas, although different key biogenic habitats can be found in each of these habitat types. Different configurations of grain sizes and materials are indicative of geologic history, hydrodynamic conditions, seafloor topography and biological activity and as a result host differing communities of organisms.

Source and reference:

“The Folk sediment triangle and the hierarchy of Folk classification (15, 6 and 4 classes, plus an additional class “rock and boulders,” indicated by the arrow) used in the EMODnet Geology project.” (Kaskela et al., 2019).

Folk RL, Andrews PB, Lewis DW. 1970. Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 13:937–968. DOI:10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211

Kaskela, A. M., Kotilainen, A. T., Alanen, U., Cooper, R., Green, S., Guinan, J., et al. (2019). Picking up the pieces–Harmonising and collating seabed substrate data for European maritime areas. Geosciences 9:84. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9020084 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331094612_Picking_Up_the_Pieces-Harmonising_and_Collating_Seabed_Substrate_Data_for_European_Maritime_Areas

References for sediment and rock layers included:

Bostock, H., C. Jenkins, K. Mackay, L. Carter, S. Nodder, A. Orpin, A. Pallentin, and R. Wysoczanski. 2019. Distribution of surficial sediments in the ocean around New Zealand/Aotearoa. Part A: continental slope and deep ocean. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 62:1-23.

Bostock, H., C. Jenkins, K. Mackay, L. Carter, S. Nodder, A. Orpin, A. Pallentin, and R. Wysoczanski. 2019. Distribution of surficial sediments in the ocean around New Zealand/Aotearoa. Part B: continental shelf. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 62:24-45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00288306.2018.1523199

Jenkins CJ. 1997. Building offshore soils databases. Sea Technology. 38(12):25–28.

Smith, A. N., Duffy, C., Anthony, J., and Leathwick, J. R. 2013. Predicting the distribution and relative abundance of fishes on shallow subtidal reefs around New Zealand, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand



Service Item Id: d5e26b692c5c4b07a6fadbeda00c1267

Copyright Text: NIWA

Spatial Reference: 2193  (2193)


Single Fused Map Cache: false

Initial Extent: Full Extent: Units: esriMeters

Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP

Document Info: Supports Dynamic Layers: true

MaxRecordCount: 2000

MaxImageHeight: 4096

MaxImageWidth: 4096

Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF

Supports Query Data Elements: true

Min Scale: 0

Max Scale: 0

Supports Datum Transformation: true



Child Resources:   Info   Dynamic Layer

Supported Operations:   Export Map   Identify   QueryLegends   QueryDomains   Find   Return Updates